10/30/07

The Muse: Inspiration Behind the Design

Designers find inspiration for their collections from a number of different things. A beautiful landscape, a color that grabs their attention or a strong emotion can all ignite spurs of creativity. Most commonly, however, designers are inspired by the people surrounding them, often a specific person, sometimes referred to as a muse. According to Suzy Menkes, highly acclaimed fashion writer and editor, a muse is “one of the [fashion] industry’s least understood, most controversial but seemingly essential roles.” Designers have long been inspired by certain stylish friends of high class stature, but the air of aristocracy surrounding the role of the muse makes one wonder if this role will fade away with an increasingly modern and more practical world.

Today the term muse is used too broadly; so many people are not exactly sure what the term implies. According to Lady Amanda Harlech (seen below with designer Karl Lagerfield), a former editor who married into aristocracy and is probably the most well known muse in the fashion world, “There is a need of some figure in the highly sophisticated image-making houses: something romantic and ephemeral, a link with the old way of creating that is rapidly disappearing.” In this sense of the word, this woman must come from tremendous wealth or often royalty in order to afford couture clothes that emit the level of elegance and romance that is required of a muse. Often confused with fashion icons, there is a significant distinction. A fashion icon develops when there is a public obsession with stylish woman such as Jackie Onasses, Marilyn Monroe and Princess Diana, while a fashion muse works directly with a designer, ideally serving as a constant source of influence. Since many designers are men they often design their clothing with one particular woman in mind, to use as a form of reference for the shape of their clothing and to receive feedback from. Male designers, who are most likely gay, may have great vision, but they need to make sure that their ideas are something that a real girl can relate to and wear.

Originally referring to Greek goddesses, like the one featured to the right, in classical mythology, the role of the muse seems to be shifting from that of a passive idol to a more active participant. Today’s muse has a much higher level of interaction with the designers and can contribute to a designer’s vision in various ways. Sometimes they suggest ideas, or shop for intriguing pieces; sometimes it is as simple as portraying themselves in captivating ways. Amanda Harlech, former muse to John Galliano, would change clothes as many as six times a day to constantly evoke new ideas and new inventions. Muses today often work along side the designer, and act as a stylist or creative advisor. The designer-muse relationship is mysterious and complicated, which often makes it controversial. Although the designers are usually gay, according to Alexander McQueen’s former muse, Isabella Blow, “the deep friendship can often get quite sexual; it does have a romance.” The graphics below demonstrate how Isabella's style influenced McQueen's designs. Because they are working so close together a designer often becomes infatuated with their muse, worshiping everything she does, so needless to say a break-up between the two is almost like a divorce. The position of a muse used to be more of an unspoken relationship, yet now the job often receives a high level of recognition and even a salary in some cases.

Like the Greek goddesses that preceded them, today’s muse have a certain untouchable quality, which makes them both intriguing yet difficult to relate to. A designer not only wants their creations to be beautiful, but also sellable and wearable. Simon Doonan, creative director at Barney’s New York, has a more practical opinion about what a muse should emulate. He feels that a “democratization of the muse” is needed, or in other words that designers could create styles for a wider range of people if they based their designs off figures that the public could better identify with. The figure must still be a public spectacle, however, perhaps not so aristocratic. Celebrities, in Doonan’s opinion, are easier for the public to relate to because they are a constant media spectable. There is no doubt that the muse serves an important element in the world of fashion design, for inspiration is the key element to any successful collection, however the role she plays is in a transitional state and it is difficult to determine what the muse of the future will be like.

1 comment:

KGP said...

First off, your post topic is very intriguing. I have never personally heard of a muse or every thought such a thing existed. It sounds like these muses are almost god-like to the designers. I think you do a great job in conveying this in your post: “Because they are working so close together a designer often becomes infatuated with their muse, worshiping everything she does, so needless to say a break-up between the two is almost like a divorce.” I am wondering if maybe you could give an example of a modern day muse and a designer’s struggle with this concept of “divorce.” You named several examples of muses, but none with this level of controversy.
I think you make a good point that because these women are goddess like, they have an untouchable quality. I think that theme transcends many aspects of life. We want what we cannot have. It was important that you used professional opinions in your post, like from Simon Doonan, also supported with a good article: “Designers could create styles for a wider range of people if they based their designs off figures that the public could better identify with.” These aristocratic figures do seem very hard to identify with, and as you said during your blog show, that is where many designers get their couture fashion lines that are impractical for people to wear outside of the runway.
As far as some of your links, several of them were repeated. However, I thought the links you did provide were rich and added to your comments on the topic. They were diverse websites that were easy to explore outside of the context of just the article you proposed.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.